From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: linux-next: old trees Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:44:32 +0530 Message-ID: <52383998.6080504@ti.com> References: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:46079 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752481Ab3IQLON (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:14:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Hi Stephen, On Tuesday 17 September 2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below, > so apologies if you get two copies. > > I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in > linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been > commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me know if the tree is not > longer in use. I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they > will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer > needed. > > Tree Last commit > ---- ----------- > davinci 2 years, 2 months ago You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking you to remove it for so long. Regards, Sekhar