From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the aio-direct tree
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:25:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52391D21.6080703@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130918020035.GK13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On 09/17/2013 09:00 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:56:38AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Al,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got conflicts in fs/nfs/direct.c
>> and fs/nfs/file.c between commits b9517433d65d ("dio: Convert direct_IO
>> to use iov_iter"), a8431c667ae8 ("nfs: add support for read_iter,
>> write_iter") and a1b8ec384b73 ("nfs: simplify swap") from the aio-direct
>> tree and commit c18d1ec44f7a ("nfs: use %p[dD] instead of open-coded (and
>> often racy) equivalents") from the vfs tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> is required).
>
> Hrm... FWIW, I would greatly prefer to offload these printk patches to
> NFS and NFSD trees. Didn't get around to that yet, but...
>
> As for aio-direct... Two questions:
> * had anybody tried to measure the effect on branch predictor from
> introducing that method vector? Commit d6afd4c4 ("iov_iter: hide iovec
> details behind ops function pointers")
Any suggestions for a good benchmark?
> * WTF does aforementioned commit lack its author's s-o-b? The same
> goes for a lot of zab's commits in there...
That would be my bad. Zach's original patches had his s-o-b (w/an Oracle
email address). I'll add them back.
Shaggy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-18 0:56 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the aio-direct tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18 2:00 ` Al Viro
2013-09-18 3:25 ` Dave Kleikamp [this message]
2013-09-18 17:06 ` Zach Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-05 3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52391D21.6080703@oracle.com \
--to=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zab@zabbo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).