From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 15 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:21:27 -0700 Message-ID: <525E2257.7030604@roeck-us.net> References: <1381845763-10487-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:57164 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879Ab3JPFVd (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 01:21:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1381845763-10487-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thierry Reding , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Brown On 10/15/2013 07:02 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the > repository below: > > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git > > A next-20131015 tag is also provided for convenience. > > Gained a new conflict, but nothing too exciting. x86 and ARM default > configurations build fine. I've also used an x86 allmodconfig build to > check for build errors. Mark fixed most of those in the trees that he > created last Thursday and Friday, so I've cherry-picked them on top of > the final merge. There was one new build failure in the staging tree > that was trivial to fix so I added a patch to the tree as well. > This build does look much better than the previous ones. I 'only' get 12 build failures out of 106 configurations. Worst are powerpc builds, with 7 out of 14 builds failed. Details are at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders; look for the 'next' column. Guenter