From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:31:44 -0700 Message-ID: <526AF150.1030004@infradead.org> References: <1382713426-2680-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:43769 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752364Ab3JYWbq (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:31:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1382713426-2680-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thierry Reding , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Brown On 10/25/13 08:03, Thierry Reding wrote: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the > repository below: > > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git > > A next-20131025 tag is also provided for convenience. > > One new trivial conflicts and a new build failure caused by an incorrect > use of the genpool allocator. > > Upon a request from Olof Johansson I've only included fixes for build > breakage as a result of interactions between the various trees. But > since I've fixed many of the other build failures already, I've pushed > those to a separate tag (next-20131025-fixes). That builds fine on x86 > 32-bit and 64-bit allmodconfigs as well as ARM and x86 default > configurations. Most of the PowerPC build errors have also been fixed. That's unfortunate. The fixes should be part of the tree IMO. -- ~Randy