From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:43:42 -0700 Message-ID: <53C4BF8E.4010509@roeck-us.net> References: <20140715132946.771def89@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:57679 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752047AbaGOFnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:43:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140715132946.771def89@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/14/2014 08:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > After merging the v4l-dvb tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) > failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:764:2: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] > { cpu_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) }, > ^ > arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:764:2: error: (near initialization for 'powerpc_topology[0].sd_flags') [-Werror] > > Caused by commit 6a0b50087a89 ("Merge branch 'patchwork' into > to_next"). The change to include/linux/sched.h in this merge commit > does not seem to appear in either of the parents of the merge. > > Its also a change that (when suggested) was shown to cause more > problems than it was worth and dropped. I can't imagine how it ended > up in the merge commit. > Do you mean b6220ad66 (sched: Fix compiler warnings) ? I thought that was accepted a week or so ago. Guenter