From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oded Gabbay Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:21:04 +0200 Message-ID: <54C9ED70.1020803@amd.com> References: <20150129133857.2bdbb86d@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150129133857.2bdbb86d@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell , Dave Airlie Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Goz List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 01/29/2015 04:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c: In function 'kgd2kfd_device_init': > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c:193:11: error: 'max_num_of_processes' undeclared (first use in this function) > size += (max_num_of_processes * sizeof(struct pm4_map_process) + > ^ > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c:193:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c:194:26: error: 'max_num_of_queues_per_process' undeclared (first use in this function) > max_num_of_processes * max_num_of_queues_per_process * > ^ So I think that Dave's drm-next now contains the correct code. Will you merge it again, or do you do it daily anyway ? I fear I'm entirely clear with the details of the linux-next process. Oded