From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudip Mukherjee Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 12 Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:25:24 +0530 Message-ID: <56BF7C1C.8080407@gmail.com> References: <20160212162035.1e0260cd@canb.auug.org.au> <20160212060241.GA1390@sudip-pc> <20160213074935.GA27448@roeck-us.net> <20160213155028.GA17704@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:32850 "EHLO mail-pa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751083AbcBMSzg (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:55:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160213155028.GA17704@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski Cc: Guenter Roeck , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar On Saturday 13 February 2016 09:20 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 06:57:24AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> I think Borislav's patch should fix this. > > Yeah, guys, can you give it a try: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160210145116.GF23914@pd.tnic Its late night in our time so I could only test with i386 defconfig and it builds fine with gcc-4.6.3 regards sudip