From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:38:30 +0100 Message-ID: <56D55506.4050007@atmel.com> References: <20160301145700.784f5fcf@canb.auug.org.au> <20160301150054.2cb0e728@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:51470 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbcCAIiW (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:38:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160301150054.2cb0e728@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alexandre Belloni , Boris BREZILLON Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 01/03/2016 05:00, Stephen Rothwell a =E9crit : > Hi all, >=20 > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:57:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in: >> >> drivers/clk/at91/clk-main.c >> >> between commit: >> >> 99a81706526f ("clk: at91: remove IRQ handling and use polling") >> >> from the arm-soc tree and commit: >> >> 8c1b1e54faed ("clk: at91: Remove impossible checks for of_clk_get_= parent_count()") >> >> from the clk tree. >=20 > And the same for drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c Stephen, Both fixes seem good. Thanks! Bye, --=20 Nicolas Ferre