From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 15:49:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573B2151.5010907@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160517133834.GF23555@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 05/17/2016 03:38 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 05/17/2016 09:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Someone's not gonna be happy with commit 6077776b5908 ("bpf: split
>>> HAVE_BPF_JIT into cBPF and eBPF variant") breaking the sort order again...
>>
>> Wasn't aware of that. Maybe I'm missing something, but there appears
>> to be no throughout consistent ordering ...
>>
>> [...]
>> select HAVE_PERF_REGS
>> select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
>> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT
>> select IRQ_DOMAIN
>> select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>> [...]
>> select RTC_LIB
>> select SPARSE_IRQ
>> select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
>> select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
>> select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
>> [...]
>
> We keep fixing them as we merge other stuff. For example, latest
> mainline has commit 8ee708792e1c ("arm64: Kconfig: remove redundant
> HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE definition") which also fixes up the
> Kconfig order.
Understood, thanks for the clarification (and sorry for the sort order
issue).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 0:24 linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-17 6:05 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-05-17 7:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-05-17 7:12 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-05-17 13:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-05-17 13:49 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-07-03 1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03 7:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573B2151.5010907@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).