From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 3 (switchdev & TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:43:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58aebf62-54f8-9084-147b-801ea65327bb@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203155405.31404722@canb.auug.org.au>
On 12/2/19 8:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any material for v5.6 to your linux-next included
> trees until after v5.5-rc1 has been released.
>
> Changes since 20191202:
I am seeing this (happens to be on i386; I doubt that it matters):
CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NET_SWITCHDEV
Depends on [n]: NET [=y] && INET [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] && NET_VENDOR_TI [=y] && (ARCH_DAVINCI || ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
because TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV blindly selects NET_SWITCHDEV even though
INET is not set/enabled, while NET_SWITCHDEV depends on INET.
However, the build succeeds, including net/switchdev/*.
So why does NET_SWITCHDEV depend on INET?
It looks like TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV should depend on INET (based on the
Kconfig rules), but in practice it doesn't seem to matter to the build.
thanks.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 4:54 linux-next: Tree for Dec 3 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-03 16:33 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 3 (pinctrl-equilibrium) Randy Dunlap
2019-12-04 9:36 ` Tanwar, Rahul
2019-12-04 16:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-12-04 23:36 ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-03 16:52 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 3 (drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix) Randy Dunlap
2019-12-03 23:43 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2019-12-04 15:35 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 3 (switchdev & TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV) Grygorii Strashko
2019-12-04 16:11 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58aebf62-54f8-9084-147b-801ea65327bb@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).