From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Metcalf Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:47:00 -0400 Message-ID: <5ed77f4c-44eb-ca02-1373-e878d3dea31e@mellanox.com> References: <20160621154638.1169904b@canb.auug.org.au> <5768E650.2080506@gmail.com> <20160621124247.GM30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160621124247.GM30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 6/21/2016 8:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:08:29AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: >> You need to have a tilepro toolchain (not tilegx) > Ah, should I go use TARGET=tilepro-linux ? Yes. >> and build with ARCH=tilepro. > tilepro) > ARCH=tile > CROSS_COMPILE=tilegx-linux- > if [ "$CONFIG" == "defconfig" ] ; then > CONFIG=tilepro_defconfig > fi > ;; > > So I suppose that too is wrong. Yup. That's actually just building exactly what "tilegx" would build by default. I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream gcc/binutils/etc so should be easy enough to include. There's also a cross-toolchain for x64 I put up a while ago [1] that you could grab if you wanted to try it. [1] http://www.mellanox.com/repository/solutions/tile-scm/tilepro-x86_64.tar.bz2 -- Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies http://www.mellanox.com