linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 17 (mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:45:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60d26835-245f-9f47-3027-39710d28db74@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNARCT3YQEnVE0NMCphSuqvjLoG2EXdpdcAZuoEOD_mFyEw@mail.gmail.com>

On 20/04/20 3:27 pm, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:28 PM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/04/20 12:12 pm, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> + Masahiro Yamada, Adrian Hunter
>>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 16:48, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/16/20 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20200416:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> on i386:
>>>>
>>>>   CC      drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.o
>>>> In file included from ../include/linux/build_bug.h:5:0,
>>>>                  from ../include/linux/bitfield.h:10,
>>>>                  from ../drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c:9:
>>>> ../drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c: In function ‘sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets’:
>>>> ../include/linux/compiler.h:394:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_63’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
>>>>   _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>>>>                                       ^
>>>> ../include/linux/compiler.h:375:4: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
>>>>     prefix ## suffix();    \
>>>>     ^~~~~~
>>>> ../include/linux/compiler.h:394:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
>>>>   _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>>>>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> ../include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
>>>>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
>>>>                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> ../include/linux/bitfield.h:49:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
>>>>    BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ?  \
>>>>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> ../include/linux/bitfield.h:94:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘__BF_FIELD_CHECK’
>>>>    __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: "); \
>>>>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> ../drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c:185:11: note: in expansion of macro ‘FIELD_PREP’
>>>>   caps1 |= FIELD_PREP(SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_MASK, clk_mul);
>>
>> My guess is the compiler has decided clk_mul is constant (probably (unsigned
>> int)-1) because there is no CONFIG_COMMON_CLK i.e. clk_get_rate() is 0
>>
>> So maybe add to config MMC_SDHCI_OF_AT91
>>
>>         depends on COMMON_CLK
>>
>>>>            ^~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> 
> I checked include/linux/clk.h
> 
> 
> clk_get_rate() is guarded by CONFIG_HAVE_CLK.
> 
> I think
> 
>     depends on HAVE_CLK

Okay

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-17  4:50 linux-next: Tree for Apr 17 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-17  6:16 ` linux-next: Tree for Apr 17 (pinctrl-mcp23s08) Randy Dunlap
2020-04-17 10:22   ` Linus Walleij
2020-04-17  7:19 ` linux-next: Tree for Apr 17 Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-17  7:27   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-04-17 14:48 ` linux-next: Tree for Apr 17 (mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c) Randy Dunlap
2020-04-20  9:12   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-04-20 10:28     ` Adrian Hunter
2020-04-20 12:27       ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-20 13:45         ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2020-04-22 10:15         ` Ulf Hansson
2020-04-22 10:54           ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-17 15:23 ` linux-next: Tree for Apr 17 (drivers/char/hw_random/cctrng.c) Randy Dunlap
2020-04-17 20:14   ` Hadar Gat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60d26835-245f-9f47-3027-39710d28db74@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).