From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF54C0650F for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 19:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF92B20679 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 19:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KQljckW9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404244AbfHHTWx (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:22:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:41781 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404857AbfHHTUz (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:20:55 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id m30so44649355pff.8 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 12:20:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WofIjniXiwNzxEUaGFVhZ+h83Wcut+hzdIT3wo6e7YM=; b=KQljckW9Gh7h2hSk+gLggObASU2CPWRIxV7VyUuCJvL2RUAx4WqtitmD7N7cnp6dtx 1bSKBO7I2OZorVgWYzMkpzO3B6BIsB42z6GOkLb2mpjCUwtjti3t8QKP5k7He1Tig9zq jOrsP1LmiRh9m+6/QM88HoXQXRZChQKxEYeIqxzFY4CjN+0DkRbI9FFENeF/VtQ91ibj wjycfbIZ18hEDhEpzFP+koh8U+KaZGz/YRV29a9TWvOBJkhP59Scv9Pq8Z9GeAaM2uo2 /VeEZDsaWHSxcNBQfDgNTCOxY5hj5P58fSPg4jLgLEhbYwyCybIq1fc4MMvmXkj1JekE WURg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WofIjniXiwNzxEUaGFVhZ+h83Wcut+hzdIT3wo6e7YM=; b=j905dlwmM6NAn3oyxkou0iPfBzKeqeJffzmRXT8AbcOoiBVusEF7+xpfW3jTfzPD9g cRjY+eR1B99v0zkM7b3pJX3276aKeg4Bq2c+uQixR+SYmy8rt0hjGd7VmoZugVH/bi/O vPno7bXq9XUYZz0CWtAsPLLE+CDRBl+cW+hnstK8o7feOfU9a0+FSCMFnADj6coKNEjA YmnM1JxFZvryE5i4wiLqf2HoOWZj9AXDImbjwDIolZjsAUYMOqzndMwlKNSF71AXISj3 2upHFTt7bZCj3REdR5+YT2Vlx90iVDmJQfEJkYE+zxGuB4MyVv7Lkh+1l2133KEzA83B 044Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV8rYV1HBBjlbEo+6GUeh9Uvd3l+x2xfoHhGk2J5L8lZKkRBslZ 2+J9cmuvMxb2uwRJvcchuE0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy1nAMROP2tNRjP90YcDjSjfw5g7Jxmg/KRzY27RLDmMUbzlnugppsGaJIAUrvztZ+VMG7E7A== X-Received: by 2002:a62:16:: with SMTP id 22mr17745874pfa.151.1565292055001; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 12:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e189sm83108353pgc.15.2019.08.08.12.20.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 12:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: next/master build: 230 builds: 5 failed, 225 passed, 6 errors, 1344 warnings (next-20190805) To: Alex Deucher Cc: Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel , David Zhou , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, David Airlie , Tao Zhou , amd-gfx list , Linux-Next Mailing List , Maling list - DRI developers , Daniel Vetter , Alex Deucher , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , Dennis Li References: <5d47f990.1c69fb81.a5d88.ee1f@mx.google.com> <20190805111205.GB6432@sirena.org.uk> <20190808184149.GA441@roeck-us.net> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <768ee31a-c870-4237-f38a-b176378072b6@roeck-us.net> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:20:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 8/8/19 11:53 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:53 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:40:32AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: >>> >>> Today's -next fails to build an arm allmodconfig due to: >>> >>>> allmodconfig (arm, gcc-8) — FAIL, 2 errors, 16 warnings, 0 section mismatches >>>> >>>> Errors: >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:279:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:298:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writeb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>> >>> due to 4fa1c6a679bb0 (drm/amdgpu: add RREG64/WREG64(_PCIE) operations) >>> which introduces use of readq() and writeq(). >> >> AFAICS this problem affects all 32-bit builds, including i386. >> Is it in the process of being fixed, or should we submit a >> patch limiting DRM_AMDGPU to 64-bit builds ? > > Yes, the fix is being discussed here: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/322213/ > Please note that this does fail for i386 (32-bit x86) builds, contrary to the information in that discussion. Also, from looking into the kernel, I only see readq/writeq defined for arch/x86 in 64-bit mode; see arch/x86/include/asm/io.h. Guenter