linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 08:37:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <861qn31968.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206124451.11532a04@canb.auug.org.au>

On Mon, 06 Feb 2023 01:44:51 +0000,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)>]
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   f122576f3533 ("arm64/sme: Enable host kernel to access ZT0")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   e2d4f5ae1771 ("KVM: arm64: Introduce finalise_el2_state macro")
> 
> from the kvm-arm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the code modified by the former was moved by the latter,
> so I applied the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> I hope I got this right :-)

Thanks for giving it a go!

Catalin, we'll probably end-up taking the arm64/for-next/tpidr2 branch
into the kvmarm tree in order to minimise the damage.

Please shout if you want to solve this the other way around (taking
the finalise_el2_state refactoring in the arm64 tree).

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-06  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-06  1:44 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-06  4:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-06  8:37 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-02-06  8:43   ` Marc Zyngier
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-08  1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-08  6:25 ` Oliver Upton
2024-03-08 12:30   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-08  1:47 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-20  2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-19  2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-19 12:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-19 15:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 15:35     ` Mark Rutland
2024-02-19 15:43     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-02-19 16:49     ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-24  2:28 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-24  6:49 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-17  1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-17 11:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-18 23:02   ` Oliver Upton
2023-11-01  2:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-15  2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-15  7:37 ` Oliver Upton
2023-06-15  8:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-15  2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-15  7:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-03  0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-06  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-06  9:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-07  1:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-07  5:33   ` Oliver Upton
2023-06-07  8:45     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-19  4:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-19  9:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-23 10:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04  4:35 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-04  7:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-05-04  8:08   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-23  6:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-19  4:05 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-20  9:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-12  3:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-23  5:58 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-13  5:43 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-13 11:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-27  5:24 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-04  5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-04 11:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-04  5:17 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-30  6:26 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-29  7:00 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08  7:24 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-04  4:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-04  4:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-23  4:46 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-23 10:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-16  0:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-17  8:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-17  9:33     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-01  6:23 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-01  8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-01  6:13 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-28  5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-29  5:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-28  5:00 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-28 11:53 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-25  4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-25  8:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-25  8:44   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-29  5:18 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-24  2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-22  2:33 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-22  9:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-22  2:28 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-22  9:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12  2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-22  5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-22  8:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-22 10:29   ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-22 23:05     ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-23  1:36   ` Wei Huang
2015-01-23 11:53   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-22  5:06 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=861qn31968.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cdall@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).