From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59347C433DF for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 09:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FE12071C for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 09:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387687AbgEWJyr (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 05:54:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36610 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725270AbgEWJyr (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 05:54:47 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6CEC061A0E; Sat, 23 May 2020 02:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jcQrK-0000on-M7; Sat, 23 May 2020 11:54:26 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33AAA100D0B; Sat, 23 May 2020 11:54:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Borislav Petkov , "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , elver@google.com Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree In-Reply-To: <20200523064643.GA27431@zn.tnic> References: <20200522033119.1bbd99c5@canb.auug.org.au> <20200521173520.GL6608@willie-the-truck> <20200522171708.5f392fde@canb.auug.org.au> <20200522174944.1a1732fa@canb.auug.org.au> <20200523001223.GA23921@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200523064643.GA27431@zn.tnic> Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 11:54:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87a71zq8ml.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: Borislav Petkov writes: > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> Marco, Thomas, is there any better setup I can provide Stephen? Or >> is the next-20200519 -rcu tree the best we have right now? > > I've queued the fixes yesterday into tip:locking/kcsan and tglx said > something about you having to rebase anyway. I guess you can find him on > IRC at some point later. :) locking/kcsan is not the problem (it just has more fixes on top) core/rcu is the one which diverged and caused the merge conflict with PPC to happen twice. So Paul needs to remove the stale core/rcu bits and rebase on the current version (which is not going to change again). Thanks, tglx