From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F61C433DF for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 04:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5091A20829 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 04:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="N2H1cxAL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726309AbgETELy (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 00:11:54 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:51427 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725785AbgETELy (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 00:11:54 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49RfTK2DY8z9sT4; Wed, 20 May 2020 14:11:49 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1589947912; bh=CvJ3PF6B7+bNDUTi33BJP3o11iVrkVe5hGPX18ByTpE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=N2H1cxALj2tLLncIbgwqV7zn0zdLskGE79O/J/FdQ+Avz3bOQIH5qs7fua7VfGtDo vzGTdKO7GYA+lfQ9W6YqagcU1SZaFpXthL1fzyM5HDk1Kt2HFV5cmdu2KJFkQcGXl/ cQKFAUlhllHPb1rb6t5CcHndGdB0FmmBOLcdSFvurDYyfOHcgLJb4NbFp91oAM4wFJ gVzxy+g34zQ+6Hq/0fITUO/H58IxkQKkQGdqfjmlpf0LqPLdbBeip9tw3ylM7EEoEC m5HYiMultHvUMa2SRJwXk0wxqoTqu7nGoQ3r1mq0XIOqFuID6Tndfx39dWA6ZepLna b1/yd1OSLJlww== From: Michael Ellerman To: Stephen Rothwell , "Paul E. McKenney" , PowerPC Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree In-Reply-To: <20200519172316.3b37cbae@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20200519172316.3b37cbae@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 14:12:09 +1000 Message-ID: <87lfln8cti.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c > > between commit: > > 116ac378bb3f ("powerpc/64s: machine check interrupt update NMI accounting") > > from the powerpc tree and commit: > > 187416eeb388 ("hardirq/nmi: Allow nested nmi_enter()") > > from the rcu tree. > > I fixed it up (I used the powerpc tree version for now) and can carry the > fix as necessary. OK, I guess that works for now, we'll have to clean it up later once both trees are merged upstream. I created an issue to track it: https://github.com/linuxppc/issues/issues/298 cheers