From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E364C2D0E4 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A397B206D5 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="L8Tfofay" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726165AbgKYCri (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:47:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44598 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726155AbgKYCri (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:47:38 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 342ECC0613D4; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Cglfv1DY7z9sSs; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:47:34 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1606272455; bh=BiqObHiACRupyi7IpqkvSTHcKnK1tO8o+JWyAxdrA/Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=L8Tfofay4SCOhM5MvmVz43GD93Wfj85EL2PHJkr+oApfr6ns+iYBG4lyW3tqbRVOt cp70ORWxuDaEfuH1jnTCk3nAyMc+jJCle9j3H2xWmqH50jW5E+EoB5btJZug2Qx5JZ NrrJq6N/9TpMZMTkEIm5xPGKv7f7TD88MjRXoYpDmmjHaV0r2XXa2tFakP02whYwGC 3BGYUK/hZgvfppdTXGXXEFGJTG7fmV0ZILqkefMmfCOBI41lQ9yEqortBRwzGzpDbz VAYlQZm4zKzytWP4FwYu9wusVbmKsAgbgPssh4CPe92DyV5As9/YosBP318MYULNvT Sx44pADewOefQ== From: Michael Ellerman To: Daniel Axtens , Michael Ellerman , Stephen Rothwell , PowerPC Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree In-Reply-To: <87h7pfhac3.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> References: <20201123184016.693fe464@canb.auug.org.au> <160617472873.1817800.16473753588453276266.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> <87h7pfhac3.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:47:31 +1100 Message-ID: <87r1oiywxo.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Daniel Axtens writes: > Thanks sfr and mpe. > >> Applied to powerpc/fixes. >> >> [1/1] powerpc/64s: Fix allnoconfig build since uaccess flush >> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b6b79dd53082db11070b4368d85dd6699ff0b063 > > We also needed a similar fix for stable, which has also been applied. > > I guess I should build some sort of build process that tests a whole > range of configs. I did test a few but clearly not enough. Is there a > known list that I should be using? Something from kisskb? It's basically unsolvable in general. I guess allnoconfig is a good one to build, although by default that gets you a 32-bit config. I'll send a patch to add ppc64le_allnoconfig. cheers