From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 18 (objtool)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 12:21:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8dc0ef20-c776-bfdc-de31-1759125c77e9@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919165118.lffzvrl5efbpnvux@treble>
On 9/19/19 9:51 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 09:04:21PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 9/18/19 3:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20190917:
>>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl()+0x2fb: call to gen8_canonical_addr() with UACCESS enabled
>>
>> using
>>> gcc --version
>> gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.4.1 20190424 [gcc-7-branch revision 270538]
>>
>> .o and .config files are attached.
>
> Does this fix it?
This patch produces this message:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl()+0x2fb: call to sign_extend64.constprop.20() with UACCESS enabled
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index b5f6937369ea..7e111cb5b14b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ struct i915_execbuffer {
> * canonical form [63:48] == [47]."
> */
> #define GEN8_HIGH_ADDRESS_BIT 47
> -static inline u64 gen8_canonical_addr(u64 address)
> +static __always_inline u64 gen8_canonical_addr(u64 address)
> {
> return sign_extend64(address, GEN8_HIGH_ADDRESS_BIT);
> }
>
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-19 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-18 22:10 linux-next: Tree for Sep 18 Mark Brown
2019-09-19 4:04 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 18 (objtool) Randy Dunlap
2019-09-19 16:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-09-19 19:21 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2019-09-19 19:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-09-19 21:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-09-23 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-23 12:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-09-23 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-23 14:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-09-23 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8dc0ef20-c776-bfdc-de31-1759125c77e9@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).