From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:47:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20110527151135.cd6f758a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:61802 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922Ab1E0OrV (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2011 10:47:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110527151135.cd6f758a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus , Andrew Morton On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig) > failed like this: > > drivers/misc/kgdbts.c: In function 'check_and_rewind_pc': > drivers/misc/kgdbts.c:307: error: implicit declaration of function 'instruction_pointer_set' > > Caused by commit 63ab25ebbc50 ("kgdbts: unify/generalize gdb breakpoint > adjustment") from Linus' tree. > > Lots of architectures do not use asm-generic/ptrace.h where > instruction_pointer_set() is defined. yes, but lots of arches dont implement kgdb, so it doesnt matter :). i thought i got all of them, but i must have missed some, or new arches showed up since i wrote the patches. i'll take a look later today and send out a fix. -mike