From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vineet Gupta Subject: Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 07:34:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1372192414.1888.8.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1372202983.1888.22.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <521DE5D7.4040305@synopsys.com> <52205597.3090609@synopsys.com> <5224BCF6.2080401@colorfullife.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Language: en-US Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "sedat.dilek@gmail.com" Cc: Manfred Spraul , Linus Torvalds , Davidlohr Bueso , Davidlohr Bueso , linux-next , LKML , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Andi Kleen , Rik van Riel , Jonathan Gonzalez List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 09/03/2013 12:46 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:=0A= > Just FYI:=0A= >=0A= > Linux Testing Project (LTP) will do a new release in the 1st September we= ek.=0A= > Some IPC test-suites were reworked.=0A= > Manfred can you look at them ("...msgctl08 uses one queue for each=0A= > thread pair.").=0A= > ( Might be worth to throw some words at the LTP mailing-list (that=0A= > test-case is not ideal, etc.)? )=0A= >=0A= =0A= Well we had a userspace test working before (3.10) and now it won't. In Lin= ux=0A= world that is not something we do in general - although there could be exce= ptions=0A= because the test is not idea etc - anyways not my call !=0A= =0A= However assuming we are going ahead with debugging this - can you please co= nfirm=0A= whether you see the issue on x86 as well as I have not tested that ? I vagu= ely=0A= remember one of your earlier posts suggested you did=0A= =0A= Thx,=0A= -Vineet=0A= =0A= =0A= -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org