From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:34:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20130910223624.GC13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130910154116.cc4afe048213a779040ea3cc@linux-foundation.org> <20130910224823.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130910225934.GF13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130913200000.GT13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130913203149.GW13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.212.47]:64336 "EHLO mail-vb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753441Ab3IMUeh (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:34:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130913203149.GW13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Al Viro Cc: Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Chinner , Glauber Costa On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:25:48PM -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> Yes. And I found the opposite bug in one place: when we are collecting >> dentries by walking the parents etc, we do *not* hold the global RCU >> lock, > > ??? LRU list lock, presumably? Heh, yes. You wouldn't believe how many times I mis-typed "lru" as "rcu" while doing that patch. Much of the other dentry work this merge window was all about rcu, so my fingers end up being confused.. Linus