From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:03:23 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20150728160015.142f588f@canb.auug.org.au> <20150729171256.GA10863@redhat.com> <20150908093524.507a19d8@canb.auug.org.au> <20150909085603.0173ac4e@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]:35634 "EHLO mail-io0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752180AbbIHXDY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:03:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150909085603.0173ac4e@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andy Lutomirski , Eric B Munson , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I have been applying that patch I sent to you to -next for some time. > I guess I expected Andrew to pick it up when he rebased his patch > series before submitting it to you. These things sometimes slip > through the cracks. I suspect Andrew saw that patch, and thought it was a merge fixup like you sometimes send out, and didn't realize that it actually applied directly to his series. Linus