From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: linux-next: old trees Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below, > so apologies if you get two copies. > > I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in > linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been > commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me know if the tree is not > longer in use. I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they > will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer > needed. > > Tree Last commit > ---- ----------- > 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode. There have only been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year, and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree. The arch isn't dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new changes. The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for linux-next. josh