From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sedat Dilek Subject: Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:07:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20130228111819.GF11892@cantiga.alporthouse.com> Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130228111819.GF11892@cantiga.alporthouse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson , Sedat Dilek , Dave Airlie , DRI , intel-gfx , LKML , linux-next List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] >> > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout >> > (has irq: 1)! >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] >> > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout >> > (has irq: 1)! >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log.1:Feb 22 07:36:04 fambox kernel: [ 27.408280] >> > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout >> > (has irq: 1)! >> > >> > This seems to be hard reproducible... >> > Laptop-LCD... Sandybridge Mobile-GT2. >> > >> > Is there a way to force the error? >> > >> > Possible patch see [1]. >> > >> > - Sedat - >> > >> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2192721/ > > That was: > > + if (!done) { > + status = I915_READ_NOTRACE(ch_ctl); > + DRM_ERROR("dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: > %i), status=%08x!\n", > + has_aux_irq, status); > + } > > You applied > > + if (!done) { > + status = I915_READ_NOTRACE(ch_ctl); > + DRM_ERROR("dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: > %i), status=%08x!\n", > + has_aux_irq, status); > + { > > That second '{' is the source of the compile error. Schei**e, OK I try with a v2. A hint how to force the error? - Sedat - > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre