linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:54:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUdwAiyVq5-7+qo3YL-ka4y6DfbMmjy_MTiZ+Y70y55Cw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371852439.1798.27.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
<davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 21:34 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Happy solstice!
>> >
>> > Changes since 20130620:
>> >
>> > Dropped tree: mailbox (really bad merge conflicts with the arm-soc tree)
>> >
>> > The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
>> >
>> > The leds tree still had its build failure, so I used the version from
>> > next-20130607.
>> >
>> > The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the tip, net-next, mfd and
>> > mailbox trees.
>> >
>> > The staging tree still had its build failure for which I disabled some
>> > code.
>> >
>> > The akpm tree lost a few patches that turned up elsewhere and gained
>> > conflicts against the ftrace and arm-soc trees.
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>>
>> [ CC IPC folks ]
>>
>> Building via 'make deb-pkg' with fakeroot fails here like this:
>>
>> make: *** [deb-pkg] Terminated
>> /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 181:  2386 Terminated
>> FAKEROOTKEY=$FAKEROOTKEY LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$PATHS" LD_PRELOAD="$LIB"
>> "$@"
>> semop(1): encountered an error: Identifier removed
>> semop(2): encountered an error: Invalid argument
>> semop(1): encountered an error: Identifier removed
>> semop(1): encountered an error: Identifier removed
>> semop(1): encountered an error: Invalid argument
>> semop(1): encountered an error: Invalid argument
>> semop(1): encountered an error: Invalid argument
>>
>
> Hmmm those really shouldn't be related to the message queue changes. Are
> you sure you got the right bisect?
>
> Manfred has a few ipc/sem.c patches in linux-next, starting at commit
> c50df1b4 (ipc/sem.c: cacheline align the semaphore structures), does
> reverting any of those instead of "ipc,msg: shorten critical region in
> msgrcv" help at all? Also, anything reported in dmesg?
>

First, I reverted all IPC patches from akpm-tree within -next.
Then, I isolated the culprit by git-bisecting.
As I checked my logs I did not see anything helpful.

>> The issue is present since next-20130606!
>>
>> LAST KNOWN GOOD: next-20130605
>> FIRST KNOWN BAD: next-20130606
>>
>> KNOWN GOOD: next-20130604
>> KNOWN BAD:  next-20130607 || next-20130619 || next-20130620 || next-20130621
>>
>> git-bisect says CULPRIT commit is...
>>
>>      "ipc,msg: shorten critical region in msgrcv"
>
> This I get. I went through the code again and it looks correct and
> functionally equivalent to the old msgrcv.
>

Hmm, I guess a rcu_read_unlock() is missing?

[ next-20130605 ]
...
		/* Lockless receive, part 3:
		 * Acquire the queue spinlock.
		 */
		ipc_lock_by_ptr(&msq->q_perm);
		rcu_read_unlock();
...
[ next-20130621 ]
...
		/* Lockless receive, part 3:
		 * Acquire the queue spinlock.
		 */
		ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm);
...

Whereas ipc_lock_by_ptr() is equivalent to:
rcu_read_lock();
ipc_lock_object();

>>
>> NOTE: msg_lock_(check_) routines have to be restored (one more revert needed)!
>
> This I don't get. Restoring msg_lock_[check] is already equivalent to
> reverting "ipc,msg: shorten critical region in msgrcv" and several other
> of the msq patches. What other patch needs reverted?
>

No, you have to revert both patches as the other removed
msg_lock_[check] afterwards.

> Anyway, I'll see if I can reproduce the issue, maybe I'm missing
> something.
>

Yupp, I try with adding rcu_read_unlock()... and report.

- Sedat -

> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>
>>
>> Reverting both (below) commits makes fakeroot build via 'make dep-pkg" again.
>>
>> I have tested the revert-patches with next-20130606 and next-20130621
>> (see file-attachments).
>>
>> My build-script is attached!
>>
>> Can someone of the IPC folks look at that?
>> Thanks!
>>
>> - Sedat -
>>
>>
>> P.S.: Commit-IDs listed below.
>>
>> [ next-20130606 ]
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/?id=next-20130606
>>
>> "ipc: remove unused functions"
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=8793fdfb0d0a6ed5916767e29a15d3eb56e04e79
>>
>> "ipc,msg: shorten critical region in msgrcv"
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=c0ff93322847a54f74a5450032c4df64c17fdaed
>>
>> [ next-20130621 ]
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/?id=next-20130621
>>
>> "ipc: remove unused functions"
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=941ce57c81dcceadf55265616ee1e8bef18b0ad3
>>
>> "ipc,msg: shorten critical region in msgrcv"
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=62190df4081ee8504e3611d45edb40450cb408ac
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-21 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-21 19:34 linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ] Sedat Dilek
2013-06-21 22:07 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-21 22:54   ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
2013-06-21 23:11     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-21 23:14       ` Sedat Dilek
2013-06-21 23:15     ` Sedat Dilek
2013-06-25 16:10 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-06-25 20:33   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-25 21:41     ` Sedat Dilek
2013-06-25 23:29       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-28 11:58         ` ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]) Vineet Gupta
2013-08-29  3:04           ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-29  7:21             ` Vineet Gupta
2013-08-29  7:52               ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-30  8:19                 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-08-30  8:27                   ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-30  8:46                     ` ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? Vineet Gupta
     [not found]                       ` <CALE5RAvaa4bb-9xAnBe07Yp2n+Nn4uGEgqpLrKMuOE8hhZv00Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-30 16:31                         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-31 17:50                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-02  4:58                             ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-02 16:29                               ` Manfred Spraul
2013-09-03  7:16                                 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-09-03  7:34                                   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-03  7:49                                     ` Manfred Spraul
2013-09-03  8:43                                       ` Sedat Dilek
2013-09-03  8:44                                 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-03  8:57                                   ` Manfred Spraul
2013-09-03  9:16                                     ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-03  9:23                                       ` Manfred Spraul
2013-09-03  9:51                                         ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-03 10:16                                           ` Manfred Spraul
2013-09-03 10:32                                             ` ipc msg now works (was Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7?) Vineet Gupta
2013-09-03 22:46                                               ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+icZUUdwAiyVq5-7+qo3YL-ka4y6DfbMmjy_MTiZ+Y70y55Cw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).