From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sedat Dilek Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:40:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20130410184852.92a3a02bbe5c3a040be76365@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:48134 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750975Ab3DJKkd (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:40:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130410184852.92a3a02bbe5c3a040be76365@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130409: > > The vfs tree lost its build failure. > Beyond build-failures in vfs-next [0] and [1], it was not bootable (see [2] till [4])! This is now all fixed, thanks to all involved people! $ cat /proc/version Linux version 3.9.0-rc6-next20130410-1-iniza-small (sedat.dilek@gmail.com@fambox) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #1 SMP Wed Apr 10 11:55:58 CEST 2013 NOTE: There still exists the NULL-pointer-deref in cpufreq for me on Intel SandyBridge CPU (see [5]) on reboot and when CPUs get offline. - Sedat - [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/7/229 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136552249527170&w=2 [2] http://marc.info/?t=136545773000008&r=1&w=2 [3] http://marc.info/?t=136545603700003&r=1&w=2 [4] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136552718229123&w=2 [5] http://marc.info/?t=136551588400003&r=1&w=2