From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaud Lacombe Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tty tree related) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20110825161843.daf46b6b4023926fcfeec387@canb.auug.org.au> <20110825140820.GA9126@kroah.com> <4E56689D.3080202@freescale.com> <20110826015111.49af16f792d5554fd931d230@canb.auug.org.au> <20110826103932.1626f1c5542b660bcd1b24aa@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:56398 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754466Ab1HZPrn (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110826103932.1626f1c5542b660bcd1b24aa@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Greg KH , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, [Removed PPC folks from the CC list, the conversation drifted.] On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:09:20 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> >> If you could provide an exhaustive list of them, I'd be interested. Do >> you account/reference them in the report you make on each new -next >> tree ? > > I don't refer to them at all :-( > > If you are not just referring to powerpc ones, then an x86_64 > allmodconfig is a good place to start, there are several in there. > > Otherwise, I will send you the results of some of my builds this evening. > Couldn't all the error log be public, rotated over a 7 iteration period ? That would be fair to everyone. Thanks, - Arnaud