From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CACxGe6uUauuF=JUVvoc-se+neJVbCU9TbxORPvbahp66qJY4Jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140317185542.fe4554210fc1893b44289008@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20140317182953.GA10565@kroah.com> <20140319153008.GC31293@kroah.com> <20140321122434.06755C40567@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171]:47359 "EHLO
	mail-ig0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751786AbaCUOha (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:37:30 -0400
Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hl1so1550036igb.4
        for <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140321122434.06755C40567@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:30:08 -0700, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27:36PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
>> > However, I still find myself coming back to a fundamental question: why
>> > were these bindings fine in April 2013, passed review, and were acked,
>> > but not fine today.  Here's the links to the emails acking their
>> > introduction which Sylwester Nawrocki sent me:
>> >
>> >   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg61899.html
>> >   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg62458.html
>> >
>> > So... *shrug*.  Make of this what you will.
>>
>> Thanks for the details, I'll just leave my tree as-is for now, as that
>> seems the simplest thing to do.
>
> Yes, please leave it in your tree. I've caused noise and trouble than I
> should, and could have handled it differently. I apologize.

s/should/should not have/

g.