From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:10:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20120213172613.be7258c4c34431ff31dcbbef@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:36516 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755804Ab2BMWK0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:10:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120213172613.be7258c4c34431ff31dcbbef@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120210: > > New trees: iscsi, dma-mapping > > The pci tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20120210. > > The target-updates tree lost its build failure. > > The gpio tree still has its build failure for which I reverted a commit. I've pushed out a new tree that restricts the sodaville driver to x86. This should no longer be a problem. g.