From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the tpmdd tree
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:16:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADYN=9JntrniMnmEMd9igVSovEQjLV9q006cCATLHWrtBhWWHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916014535.GU4352@sirena.co.uk>
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 03:45, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
Hi,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kselftest tree got a conflict in:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
> 3fb2179b0f3553a ("selftests/tpm2: Add the missing TEST_FILES assignment")
>
> from the tpmdd tree and commit:
>
> d04e26067d13f01 ("selftests: tpm2: install python files")
>
> from the kselftest tree.
If I re-read the Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst
I think the patch from the kselftest tree should be dropped.
I saw that I didn't send an email to the tpm maintainers or the tpm
list when I sent the
patch, I'm sorry.
Cheers,
Anders
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile
> index bf401f725eef8,1a5db1eb8ed51..0000000000000
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile
> @@@ -2,4 -2,4 +2,5 @@@
> include ../lib.mk
>
> TEST_PROGS := test_smoke.sh test_space.sh
> +TEST_FILES := tpm2.py tpm2_tests.py
> + TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := tpm2.py tpm2_tests.py
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 1:45 linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the tpmdd tree Mark Brown
2019-09-16 13:16 ` Anders Roxell [this message]
2019-09-16 13:42 ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 14:05 ` shuah
2019-09-16 18:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADYN=9JntrniMnmEMd9igVSovEQjLV9q006cCATLHWrtBhWWHQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).