From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E4EC433FF for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDE521880 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eaQQQALi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390252AbfHHSyH (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:54:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:39895 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390228AbfHHSyH (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:54:07 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id t16so5815355wra.6 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:54:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LOP3JntYPgb4inWvNcmObUOMv1XMpxVUdJZwgqRnphQ=; b=eaQQQALibSFNaHCTtKDmgbd6OwQvK7RGFuHD6JI1IJGY+L0d6D9+9MLhpt/Zcuuxpc R/pui5mbXDUebn2oc5ZC5exlpHHbetvpA1S82Ttkyxq7mAashE7oUxu31+OVvABkfyRD OStZAGKWnEQQp2enyfGH7YIAux0R9TkCZqClnmhTukh7FqHHWf6Wq2ETjGDoVzhBSsd1 sRzPUdDD41PxRH4rPo/PZDqiB4spDOm7rkOLOgp+Qy+6rfX15sckDpVrzrKi482/KqY1 M3d9smR9bOuDG/wzPuz6CzQUU8T/z84Ze45Qh4NLGGyuxLycASdx9AE+ub75tHCIZfze 4zGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LOP3JntYPgb4inWvNcmObUOMv1XMpxVUdJZwgqRnphQ=; b=nf6Th0L2bXC9FjbQJZsiBiOfhe2l9p3c4zA0HRJmVQak6/994SZYBXVgLIu6+dJ3sa I20jsk0NdOd8GrZYhY6PwoSzC31SV+I9K5k2NvLnIa/wiTIuXdsE76YEXox8A4rQSAA1 qmrlwa21cZZ1l7Gpfv+h8MsoBLqyeAqUKLj9CR2kvR4TznA3V/9ChoVjCr8FLSrvnfno advuAqLz7OunP64oj9o9T+6u6mUgOee1lqSXGfkkbH/NhwXkRlBZFsC6r3360Mpq8Hiu GxTxHW2OWBNTVeEkrKWS3CSJ5SKPCQUCvR94WvEtlMouDGSxmzzVWLxyBUAEqJqN0iFi n4Ww== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWB6YpCTzhWSjStFr1blwXMNMn4eJvzb9B8d8031zRNGbNmCQTk YpSUVYPhFyIXdzBTyS2vUC+M6/Ms4TVbw2cLEC5Ubqsk X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwHdYZA2F2s3/isE9T5301ZzT69++eZM1KslECeXSEnQQ5qDk0pE15X4tdOrg8UzJKAGqstnnoZHpTP8wjEkQg= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6ccd:: with SMTP id c13mr19608509wrc.4.1565290444617; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:54:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5d47f990.1c69fb81.a5d88.ee1f@mx.google.com> <20190805111205.GB6432@sirena.org.uk> <20190808184149.GA441@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <20190808184149.GA441@roeck-us.net> From: Alex Deucher Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:53:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: next/master build: 230 builds: 5 failed, 225 passed, 6 errors, 1344 warnings (next-20190805) To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel , David Zhou , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, David Airlie , Tao Zhou , amd-gfx list , Linux-Next Mailing List , Maling list - DRI developers , Daniel Vetter , Alex Deucher , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Dennis Li Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:53 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:40:32AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: > > > > Today's -next fails to build an arm allmodconfig due to: > > > > > allmodconfig (arm, gcc-8) =E2=80=94 FAIL, 2 errors, 16 warnings, 0 se= ction mismatches > > > > > > Errors: > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:279:9: error: implicit= declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readb'? [-Werror=3Dimplicit= -function-declaration] > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:298:3: error: implicit= declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writeb'? [-Werror=3Dimplic= it-function-declaration] > > > > due to 4fa1c6a679bb0 (drm/amdgpu: add RREG64/WREG64(_PCIE) operations) > > which introduces use of readq() and writeq(). > > AFAICS this problem affects all 32-bit builds, including i386. > Is it in the process of being fixed, or should we submit a > patch limiting DRM_AMDGPU to 64-bit builds ? Yes, the fix is being discussed here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/322213/ Alex > > Guenter > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx