From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:22:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGa+x878Kz6mw9UduLtTBTJN3DSfKQeaCvG_-8WTW1QpVadSow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130902180900.GC11030@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:57:15PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:04:25PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>> > drivers/cpuidle/Makefile between commits b98e01ad4ed9 ("cpuidle: Add
>> > Kconfig.arm and move calxeda, kirkwood and zynq") and d3f2950f2ade ("ARM:
>> > ux500: cpuidle: Move ux500 cpuidle driver to drivers/cpuidle") from the
>> > pm tree and commit 14d2c34cfa00 ("cpuidle: big.LITTLE: vexpress-TC2 CPU
>> > idle driver") from the arm-soc tree.
>> >
>> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> > is required).
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>> >
>> > diff --cc drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
>> > index 0b9d200,3b6445c..0000000
>> > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
>> > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
>> > @@@ -5,9 -5,7 +5,10 @@@
>> > obj-y += cpuidle.o driver.o governor.o sysfs.o governors/
>> > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED) += coupled.o
>> >
>> > -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_CALXEDA) += cpuidle-calxeda.o
>> > -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_KIRKWOOD) += cpuidle-kirkwood.o
>> > -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_ZYNQ) += cpuidle-zynq.o
>> > -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_BIG_LITTLE) += cpuidle-big_little.o
>> > +##################################################################################
>> > +# ARM SoC drivers
>> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-calxeda.o
>> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_KIRKWOOD_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-kirkwood.o
>> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_ZYNQ_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-zynq.o
>> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_U8500_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-ux500.o
>> > ++obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_BIG_LITTLE) += cpuidle-big_little.o
>>
>>
>> Might want to sort u8500 before zynq, but otherwise looks fine.
>
> I noticed that owing to the merge, CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_BIG_LITTLE should be moved
> to the newly introduced Kconfig.arm. How are we going to handle this ? It is
> just a matter of renaming the config entry and moving it to Kconfig.arm.
>
For the merge window, we'll merge it as is, but a rename
cleanup/rename patch for v3.12-rc would be appreciated.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-09 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 8:04 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-29 17:57 ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-02 18:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-09 17:22 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2013-09-10 8:59 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-29 8:00 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-29 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-27 8:33 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-27 15:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-24 6:54 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-25 16:15 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-10 7:17 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-10 8:36 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-11 8:37 ` Olof Johansson
2013-04-19 10:59 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-09-24 9:21 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-24 17:02 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGa+x878Kz6mw9UduLtTBTJN3DSfKQeaCvG_-8WTW1QpVadSow@mail.gmail.com \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=keun-o.park@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).