From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Gmeiner Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 08:40:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1360771110-9490-1-git-send-email-christian.gmeiner@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]:33653 "EHLO mail-qc0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754981Ab3CDHki (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 02:40:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Bryan Wu Cc: akpm , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org ping -- Christian Gmeiner, MSc 2013/2/23 Christian Gmeiner : > 2013/2/15 Bryan Wu : >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Christian Gmeiner >> wrote: >>> During the development of this driver an in-house register >>> documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests >>> were done and this problem was found. It turned out that >>> the released register documentation is wrong. >>> >>> The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one. >>> >>> Our customers can control LEDs from userspace via Java, >>> C++ or what every. They have running/working applications where >>> they want to control led_3 but led_2 get's used. >>> I got a bug report in our in-house bug tracker so it would be >>> great to fix this upstream. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner >> >> Thanks, Christian. >> >> And Andrew, are you going to take care of this patch? Or I will merge this. >> > > Whats the current state of the patch? Hope we can get it into 3.9 :) > > -- > Christian Gmeiner, MSc