From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079F7C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EE061130 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230340AbhINCFJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:05:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35388 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231248AbhINCFH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:05:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42C18C061762 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id g1so13755747lfj.12 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tobHcPJqhSNN4ZgtQaxMXpHgpTB6zZsMk6e9QdMIJao=; b=COw8J9SZUs4LkLiixQE+bnMy4NhxzCRXjrXYewVuOym1vN7v5KNNtqhQIlVcrbvboC UjjjEk1x1NdooPYMhBvKaSWvMvmm+9qbRiHG23qPOwLueInAFV1LTxwOeLxyCpMeQrus dKVrFrAyLVCKJ4IB9zqk3uoXaWuxBLuq4iGm4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tobHcPJqhSNN4ZgtQaxMXpHgpTB6zZsMk6e9QdMIJao=; b=sjL2bKsmioNOnXFXFf777O92G8SRGIIie+KdEG9XPLuk672yCQ7xNWQzrQxbZr9wtv Q8rWUSkdqIHvfeVJktui3IBzVg8TZ57//e80gQH1rOR3vtKFmWUBDgsJWBp+EcjuWErB po3f0UPh+2iohGtV4h3NWGkMonb0O7jV0z27jqRF/sLqLfyxS0/J6Xz1UTR/NzgZBzcd JrnSkUcX/ExW2LIWxdeunq8eBqE45+Ifsby5bShW9sJ1bNw4gRXoDx8aeECCqo7rVPzj rDXLbAYtv99ryPtxz6xgWvc4UiSJiu73pALaYxzlltv7HSdZJqneAMmoF61fiYZiYoot iZKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FWTzUzCwvH7pPTIAe6RYndaTFh1vHi1P2MjmaS4RVFm/wwfEW +PGYaubMXjj2wOzfSMKYSbvjSWOgpnK1Yt76G30= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCFbJmM+jvA1iwGiZl7KOtNWtT+e54q2EC+kW6WvtovDtCUqpqPVNCF8KtBGqpZa1z5DjBDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1325:: with SMTP id x37mr11174685lfu.101.1631585029427; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f174.google.com (mail-lj1-f174.google.com. [209.85.208.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a16sm1153015ljq.22.2021.09.13.19.03.47 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id y6so20804378lje.2 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:03:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1542:: with SMTP id 2mr13338597ljv.249.1631585027415; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:03:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210914100853.3f502bc9@canb.auug.org.au> <20210914105359.5c651d55@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:03:31 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Michael Ellerman , PowerPC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:37 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Anyway, that just makes me think that something like that patch in my > previous email is the way to go, but I would like to stress (again) > how little testing it had: exactly none. > > So please consider that nothing more than a hand-wavy "something like this". The alternative would be to just add a #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ ... #endif around the whole thing. I could do that without asking for help from the powerpc people. But it really does seem kind of wrong to include a "compiler attributes" header file to compile a *.S file. It's not like any of those attributes are valid in asm anyway. I did just verify that the patch I sent out seems to cross-compile ok. At least for the power64 defconfig. So that's _some_ testing, and implies that the patch isn't complete garbage. Linus