From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD35BC433DF for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924E92082E for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HWli+F3c" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726194AbgG3Hrd (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:47:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49650 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725892AbgG3Hrc (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:47:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com (mail-pg1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657A1C061794; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id t6so16085060pgq.1; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:47:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qtQd0r7mPWp4LCw9V5WruqvGI96T5CfT/3YOE4IYwQ0=; b=HWli+F3cevEtYkBYYAuXIgETbH5MGA5ExQ9WlWrGjRuUIvFZ37JydUyNRuJy8P5vPj 8wj20w+O+qh2W1z22hoZoyjpNes8mHlfrCxmUfkxdsuwoNWp16IbARd6DE7c83M/pEA7 rV5g81Lgcogtn+Yq+3Im0FMGGiMg3qLLQa4rPN9e++mtzRZ0tOY5pH58CfJ9HZBmx5Mr KemeY08AQzmAeJJHE2mxKjhMwfDUWVCmJdcECblJtWkRyQcyy/D0VLHewLaFItoFXrhX zoOXeCFFnJzEQqVwTeoayag3F8bzUyoNyuygIMd7HqiS/9zcaMqX1MMDBQSrzO3tftRC SWLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qtQd0r7mPWp4LCw9V5WruqvGI96T5CfT/3YOE4IYwQ0=; b=sln+m9hdVYPKr8peJDipqolfbrYI9fG6wsD5tQMADbnlFG6XgfG0KuxNMnQ1LnKj6X oHYHL0oDxTC1U6+ddL80HDTOr/v2Zx9RMxAurO0aP/31nLyJFnPGbBkOJ1uv2aiZkonT NED+C4/yKQo/CqdeFEbxIWIWtKinI02TByLXtSR0VN+GzaHzBjuBjBZZVgERv2tLIV2Y /PinjsbGc6ZLHVV+60V3IZE0ykcDxxVsGAyGbcJzvvcOr+96z5Wlrs+jOZz1uRikDDGv uWM/XakOle5inZFnpGzbfG+UuUALGVLRHMWDguQodJ67Ollzm7QtSmBvxgp+gyehu9Z3 LiPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GuWJpHyKEWlk9Flkek56o7o850lsu9yU8Jpg9Msc3odlewp4n SbiX4auQoIcfszogiDC98SS2Do293V+I5NHVAxk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvPhaxkAc8ZiP0Pqc3h7whZYpVSqj5vo0Mt3lDjRMjOkz1Mb4vjCwgIGBpxrGSQlRS1dJC8fjYpwgg3idWIL0= X-Received: by 2002:a62:7b4e:: with SMTP id w75mr1977914pfc.130.1596095251805; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:47:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200729210311.425d0e9b@canb.auug.org.au> <20200729114757.GA19388@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200729122807.GA7047@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200730005922.GA9710@gondor.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20200730005922.GA9710@gondor.apana.org.au> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:47:16 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] locking/qspinlock: Break qspinlock_types.h header loop To: Herbert Xu , Vineet Gupta , Alexey Brodkin Cc: Waiman Long , Stephen Rothwell , Petr Mladek , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sergey Senozhatsky , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:00 AM Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:04:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:35 PM Waiman Long wrote: > > > On 7/29/20 8:28 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > This patch series looks good to me. I just wonder if we should also move > > > ATOMIC64_INIT() to types.h for symmetry purpose. Anyway, > > > > Same question here. > > Yes I almost started doing it but at least one architecture (arc) > had a custom atomic64_t so I kept it out just to be on the safe > side. We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well. Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures? > We certainly could do this as a follow-up patch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko