From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the dma-mapping tree Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 08:10:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180510091634.7fb3aaf2@canb.auug.org.au> <20180515090901.74c9429e@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180515090901.74c9429e@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , ARM , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Thu, 10 May 2018 09:16:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in: >> >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> >> between commit: >> >> 4965a68780c5 ("arch: define the ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT config symbol in lib/Kconfig") >> >> from the dma-mapping tree and commit: >> >> c5deb598089c ("ARM: exynos: Remove support for Exynos5440") >> >> from the samsung-krzk tree. >> >> I fixed it up (the latter removed the whole section modified by >> the former, so I just removed the section) and can carry the fix as >> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any >> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer >> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider >> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any >> particularly complex conflicts. > > This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the dma-mapping tree. Yes, this is expected. Thanks for letting us know. I mentioned this also in my pull request to arm-soc. Best regards, Krzysztof