linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:09:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsP0ZAubGSFMsUF-GWdoggntfpqZUfjjBaN5n9XXAt+Jw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160725003028.GQ2356@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:24:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Al,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   fs/overlayfs/super.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>   e2475b7276d0 ("ovl: check mounter creds on underlying lookup")
>>
>> from the overlayfs tree and commit:
>>
>>   b3ac9a85b31c ("qstr: constify instances in overlayfs")
>>
>> from the vfs tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>
> FWIW, if Miklos could pick that one-liner into overlayfs tree, I'd be only
> happy to drop it from that queue.

OK, picked that one.

Thanks,
Miklos

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-25  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-25  0:24 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-25  0:30 ` Al Viro
2016-07-25  8:09   ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-12  2:03 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-10  0:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-10  0:17 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-10 15:04 ` Al Viro
2018-07-11  2:11   ` Al Viro
2018-06-19  1:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-19  8:40 ` David Howells
2018-06-19 13:38   ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-06-19  1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-29  1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-05  0:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18  3:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25  3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25  3:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-31 23:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-08 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-11 23:13 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-11 23:08 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-10  0:20 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-10 23:20 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-02  0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-02  1:08 ` Al Viro
2016-05-02  1:23   ` Al Viro
2016-05-02  8:30   ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJfpegsP0ZAubGSFMsUF-GWdoggntfpqZUfjjBaN5n9XXAt+Jw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).