From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 10:43:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uEr4Fs00nM3iuwwBdd+LV3_6w2sarR+i8tk02BrTHQmNA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130507112751.195757b78defdbea58aa6134@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h between commit a65851af5938 ("drm/i915:
> Make data/link N value power of two") from Linus' tree and commit
> e3b95f1eb5b9 ("drm/i915: Apply OCD to data/link m/n register #defines")
> from the drm-intel tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
> Daniel, I assume all this stuff being added to the drm-intel tree is
> going upstream very soon?
Oops, no that is stuff for 3.11. Lazy me hoped I could sneak stuff
through (since we just keep on merging features to
drm-intel-next-queued to avoid stalls), but that's obviously not what
you want for linux-next. My apologies for that mess. I've now created
a for-linux-next branch which will not contain patches heading for
3.x+1 while 3.x-rc1 hasn't been released yet.
Can you please switch over to that branch for inclusion into linux-next?
Yours, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 1:27 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07 8:43 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2013-05-08 0:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-09 0:22 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22 1:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-06 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-13 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-14 8:19 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 10:35 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 11:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-17 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:39 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-02 15:29 Mark Brown
2021-05-20 0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21 1:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-12 0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 4:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 8:22 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-08 11:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 13:20 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-23 1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23 0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-19 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-16 0:38 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-08 2:08 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22 1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-19 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-17 0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-09 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-29 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-08 4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-13 0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18 1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-26 3:54 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03 2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03 8:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02 2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-04 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKMK7uEr4Fs00nM3iuwwBdd+LV3_6w2sarR+i8tk02BrTHQmNA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).