From: NamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
To: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Subject: Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:55:08 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd_HAv5+kg26tGLZcDHWmD2MoQFFTwoDtFuvsqgZTcPJwA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1711499402.60485.1318380603125.JavaMail.root@zimbra-prod-mbox-2.vmware.com>
2011/10/12 Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>:
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "NamJae Jeon" <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
>> To: "Andrei Warkentin" <awarkentin@vmware.com>
>> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball"
>> <cjb@laptop.org>, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:16:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))
>>
>> 2011/10/12 Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>:
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "NamJae Jeon" <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
>> >> To: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, "Andrei Warkentin"
>> >> <awarkentin@vmware.com>
>> >> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "LKML"
>> >> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris
>> >> Ball"
>> >> <cjb@laptop.org>, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 7:20:48 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was:
>> >> linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))
>> >>
>> >> Hi Randy, Andrei.
>> >>
>> >> I suggest third option for this.
>> >> As you know, MMC like ATA Driver and SCSI Driver etc.. can not
>> >> enable
>> >> without CONFIG_BLOCK
>> >> So I think that mmc should be depended from CONFIG_BLOCK like
>> >> other
>> >> block device driver.
>> >> see the their Kconfig. How do you think ?
>> >
>> > MMC core doesn't not imply MMC_BLOCK. You could well use SDIO
>> > devices via MMC without any flash storage whatsoever.
>> > What I want to say is that MMC_BLOCK already depends on BLOCK. MMC,
>> > however, has no such functional dependence, as it
>> > just (effectively) provides bus and device enumeration. So I think
>> > the better solution is wrapping all MMC partition
>> > code within mmc/core/mmc.c and card.h with CONFIG_BLOCK.
>> yes, you're right, I found it after sending mail. If so, should I
>> wrap
>> CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK instead of CONFIG_MMC ? After I add CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK
>> in core/mmc.c, card.h, I can see compile is okay.
>> Thanks.
>> >
>
> I am not sure if it should be CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK or CONFIG_BLOCK. After all, the
> code you're wrapping doesn't really depend on CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK, it gets consumed by it, and
> it depends (in using that one define) only on CONFIG_BLOCK. Maybe I'm overthinking it
> and the code should just define it's own MAX_MMC_PART_NAME to be like 10 or something.
yes, I agree your opinion, If we define it is easy to solve.
I will send new patch for it today.
Thanks.
>
> A
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-11 9:11 linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-11 18:26 ` [PATCH -next] x86: perf_event_intel.c needs export.h Randy Dunlap
2011-10-11 18:49 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc) Randy Dunlap
2011-10-11 19:31 ` mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc)) Andrei Warkentin
2011-10-11 21:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-10-11 23:20 ` NamJae Jeon
2011-10-11 23:48 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-10-12 0:16 ` NamJae Jeon
2011-10-12 0:50 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-10-12 1:55 ` NamJae Jeon [this message]
2011-10-11 19:15 ` [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix build when CONFIG_BUG is not enabled Randy Dunlap
2011-10-27 8:06 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-11 19:26 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mfd/intel_msic.c) Randy Dunlap
2011-10-11 19:32 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (gpio regulator) Randy Dunlap
2011-10-11 20:22 ` Heiko Stübner
2011-10-11 20:37 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c) Randy Dunlap
2011-10-14 17:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-11-10 13:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-11-10 14:25 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-10 15:18 ` [PATCH] ata: Fix build error in pata_of_platform (NO_IRQ usage) Anton Vorontsov
2011-11-10 15:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-06 21:22 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-06 21:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-06 23:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-07 3:51 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <20111206231626.GA31683-wnGakbxT3iijyJ0x5qLZdcN33GVbZNy3@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-07 9:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-11-10 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver Anton Vorontsov
2011-11-10 15:38 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-10 16:28 ` [PATCH] " Anton Vorontsov
2011-11-10 20:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-12-02 19:19 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-02 22:34 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-02 22:40 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-02 22:46 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-02 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-02 23:18 ` [PATCH v2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-02 23:22 ` [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver Alan Cox
2011-12-03 18:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-12-02 19:26 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-02 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-02 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-05 16:11 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-05 17:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-05 18:02 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-05 18:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-12-05 18:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112051310150.2357-QuJgVwGFrdf/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-05 18:45 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2011-12-06 6:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
[not found] ` <20111206061321.GH9192-RQcB7r2h9QmfDR2tN2SG5Ni2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-06 11:34 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 19:16 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-05 20:21 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-05 20:47 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <4EDD2DE1.1050606-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-05 20:53 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 9:30 ` Dave Martin
[not found] ` <20111206093000.GA2274-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-06 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-05 19:26 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-05 19:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-06 9:37 ` Dave Martin
[not found] ` <20111206093709.GB2274-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-06 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 11:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-12-06 11:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 11:10 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:05 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <20111206110554.53bddd14-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-06 11:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 12:11 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:37 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 11:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 13:25 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 19:56 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-06 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-06 20:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <CA+55aFwZBr+3_S9kU-+m8zN8iwOvn2miuuAy-zt7sUjW_+abBg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-06 20:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-06 19:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
[not found] ` <20111205161157.GA27550-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-05 17:41 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-10 15:35 ` [PATCH] ata: Fix build error in pata_of_platform (NO_IRQ usage) Alan Cox
2011-11-10 18:18 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c) Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <20111011201127.455df266dcbffb1d621f8576-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-11 20:45 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (iio/resolver) Randy Dunlap
[not found] ` <4E94AADA.4080204-/UHa2rfvQTnk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-12 8:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKYAXd_HAv5+kg26tGLZcDHWmD2MoQFFTwoDtFuvsqgZTcPJwA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=awarkentin@vmware.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).