From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A7EC07545 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230018AbjJYAes convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 20:34:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36676 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229568AbjJYAer (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 20:34:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com (mail-pg1-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35AA10DC; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-564b6276941so4012769a12.3; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:34:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698194085; x=1698798885; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IPJ3ikDFUsXo043wQDFUZjWLaI/XIii/rtjaUwo0cPo=; b=p/u7wmkDNA7Ec9ZRxJS5yPdSjg836B66gl60BnIZzCIl2Km3Ckf7nP0/el83PDxUXm /h3m+wedIwUp5OAx2elHEhsDLXDTlh5RCaYthfsUt8MkQpu4EDIAA5QFiyQK6s9FYNn8 idkQD2x2fJ28oDeq/iHfuVr2KBp7nMpT1qkr1MzA5l9YTeIN5PMpOjCfAQrv10IX0ver iqAGS5xWF45drIMiIFeqxVk/KlgSKXuGI0l0CaNIrRYYlnXbXNeoEnNpjR9dbYzcg/UT MnKKppWTKp1vtRxqQOZkkhQkdaHW4syohCC10bkcoOTbM3XRoYOE3LVoDsK1rCMCrB4E Ppuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwNEyjkhXQxdK5u4+vFJdzOte4zSPH7nlAKTirVm4I3dyEGZ24m 0mawQfWewXYQb4mPOQTJoVdu6gWfh/W8tKpIS08= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHuCWQmOV9T92y6SKKVVwNZ03oYE1gpCz7tq6+YH0oXEFwazTvYlG8PSf0eqOaJsq1BsYXFVbR/UuAo0ZLHPSs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1602:b0:27d:4dae:3c62 with SMTP id n2-20020a17090a160200b0027d4dae3c62mr13428350pja.27.1698194084918; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:34:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231025102647.321c6629@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20231025102647.321c6629@canb.auug.org.au> From: Namhyung Kim Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:34:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 4:27 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf) > failed like this: > > perf/util/pmu-flex.c:1812:1: error: unterminated comment > 1812 | /** Setup the input buffer state to scan a string. The next call to yylex() will > | ^ > perf/util/pmu-flex.c:550:24: error: 'yy_fatal_error' used but never defined [-Werror] > 550 | static void yynoreturn yy_fatal_error ( const char* msg , yyscan_t yyscanner ); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > I don't know what caused this, but the above file looks fine and redoing > the build works, so it may be some timing problem when doing an > incremental build? Yeah, I think I saw this error before. Looks like a timing issue but I believe something is wrong with it. I'll take a look. Thanks, Namhyung