Linux-Next Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (Was: linux-next: build warning after merge of the pm tree)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:15:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUc7unFPvb2hhy9kL6WcJGsDTpjOW=CD=0n+pw-OGH9Dg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4823987.OjxUhv8yZC@kreacher>

Hi Rafael,

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:27 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 1:16:50 AM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:08:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> =
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > > multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
> > >=20
> > > In file included from include/linux/irqchip.h:14,
> > >                  from arch/arm/kernel/irq.c:26:
> > > include/linux/acpi.h:682:31: warning: 'struct acpi_device' declared insid=
> > e parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declarat=
> > ion
> > >   682 | acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid2=
> > , const char *uid2)
> > >       |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > >=20
> > > and many more.
> > >=20
> > > Introduced by commit
> > >=20
> > >   d1748b57dc88 ("ACPI / utils: Introduce acpi_dev_hid_uid_match() helper")
> > >=20
> > > CONFIG_ACPI is not set for this build.
> >
> > This became a build failure for the powerpc ppc64_allmodconfig build:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/i2c.h:13,
> >                  from arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/misc.c:14:
> > include/linux/acpi.h:682:31: error: 'struct acpi_device' declared inside pa=
> > rameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration =
> > [-Werror]
> >   682 | acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid2, =
> > const char *uid2)
> >       |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > (and many more)
> >
> > I have used the pm tree from next-20191014 for today.
>
> So this looks weird, because there is an acpi_dev_put() stub in
> include/linux/acpi.h too in the same #else block and it takes a
> (struct acpi_device *) pointer too and it has not been touched by
> the commit in question.  So why has it built successfully so far?

Looks like that never warned because acpi_dev_put() is located after

    static inline struct acpi_device *
    acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(const char *hid, const char *uid, s64 hrv)
    {
            return NULL;
    }

Moving acpi_dev_hid_uid_match() down gets rid of the warning, too.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply index

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14 23:08 linux-next: build warning after merge of the pm tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-14 23:16 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (Was: linux-next: build warning after merge of the pm tree) Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-15 10:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16  9:15     ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-10-16  9:33       ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-10-15  8:23 ` linux-next: build warning after merge of the pm tree Andy Shevchenko
2019-10-15  9:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdUc7unFPvb2hhy9kL6WcJGsDTpjOW=CD=0n+pw-OGH9Dg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Next Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/0 linux-next/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-next linux-next/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next \
		linux-next@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-next

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-next


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git