linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	 Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	 Andrzej Kacprowski <andrzej.kacprowski@linux.intel.com>,
	 Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:04:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW_6rU3uVuBBKh2nMWPC0tPOpxhf9xhD2L6T5frsF=q3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231122112930.5e7c7bcd@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:29 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
>   drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   3f7c0634926d ("accel/ivpu/37xx: Fix hangs related to MMIO reset")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commits:
>
>   3de6d9597892 ("accel/ivpu: Pass D0i3 residency time to the VPU firmware")
>   cc19fedab8bd ("accel/ivpu/37xx: Print warning when VPUIP is not idle during power down")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks for your resolution!

> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
> @@@ -720,14 -731,19 +733,14 @@@ static int ivpu_hw_37xx_power_down(stru
>   {
>         int ret = 0;
>
> -       if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev))
> -               ivpu_warn(vdev, "VPU not idle during power down\n");
> +       ivpu_hw_37xx_save_d0i3_entry_timestamp(vdev);
>
> -       if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev)) {
> -               ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to reset VPU\n");
> -               ret = -EIO;
> +       if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev)) {
> +               ivpu_warn(vdev, "VPU not idle during power down\n");
> +               if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev))
> +                       ivpu_warn(vdev, "Failed to reset the VPU\n");
>         }
>
>  -      if (ivpu_pll_disable(vdev)) {
>  -              ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to disable PLL\n");
>  -              ret = -EIO;
>  -      }
>  -
>         if (ivpu_hw_37xx_d0i3_enable(vdev)) {
>                 ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to enter D0I3\n");
>                 ret = -EIO;

I've just run into the same conflict, and I think you lost the split
into two if-statements in the last hunk of commit 3f7c0634926d
("accel/ivpu/37xx: Fix hangs related to MMIO reset")?

My resolution is:

--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
@@@ -720,11 -731,16 +733,13 @@@ static int ivpu_hw_37xx_power_down(stru
  {
        int ret = 0;

+       ivpu_hw_37xx_save_d0i3_entry_timestamp(vdev);
+
 -      if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev)) {
 +      if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev))
                ivpu_warn(vdev, "VPU not idle during power down\n");
 -              if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev))
 -                      ivpu_warn(vdev, "Failed to reset the VPU\n");
 -      }

 -      if (ivpu_pll_disable(vdev)) {
 -              ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to disable PLL\n");
 +      if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev)) {
 +              ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to reset VPU\n");
                ret = -EIO;
        }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-28 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-22  0:29 linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-28 10:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-28  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-27  1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-11  1:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-21  2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-11  2:47 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-11  8:05 ` Christian König
2022-07-17 23:44   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-19  7:35     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-27  2:55     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-27  3:24       ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-27  5:37         ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-18  0:55 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-18  1:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-22  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-22  7:31 ` Christian König
2021-11-29 23:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-30  8:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-11-30 20:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-22  0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-17  1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-09  3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-18  1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-18  6:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-07-28  3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-01  3:45 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-01 23:43 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-15 21:18 Mark Brown
2019-09-16  5:29 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2019-09-17  2:43   ` Qiang Yu
2019-08-26  3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-29 10:11 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-26  2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-08  0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-13 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2017-01-17  0:59 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdW_6rU3uVuBBKh2nMWPC0tPOpxhf9xhD2L6T5frsF=q3w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrzej.kacprowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).