From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D42C35669 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA0C206EF for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="On7BfHn+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726683AbgBUVaB (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:30:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:39324 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726787AbgBUVaB (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:30:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y11so3588445wrt.6 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:29:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mFjrO26n/cvJETtY9WmVBwrxrMD8Cxit/x2V8CBB2BQ=; b=On7BfHn+DhdRcr43UtvL6NMFXApq9ckSc830tT9C/jtdKF+KHaoei4lvMiwJaNOUkf FPT9vSM9iHgFgvfqsIduljpyOpIh4g5mkMfPAn6f5qYGD9kXlOisuZOGYlA2/EFultZx 5X0kqvCBc7b+fKUEvUPDxsE8kEd1zAHQMTiWPFc2fdvWf6c8coXDuemVUCrYUVqItwOZ oZRdxIKeC5VSGOjC7UoFCa5OyNCjcq2QK8MZBAD5JlqW3kt75dDyPaM7vpKZqsp/UCGV 90m/pSZ+uIHWSuBpv/sp4Iqx5Kfi+Id/pf3NhsbI9jvYEj3EnbjxUn5wuP4vf6GV1NR1 WLjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mFjrO26n/cvJETtY9WmVBwrxrMD8Cxit/x2V8CBB2BQ=; b=asBzUGx+cURhXS24xG3j/Zfy4kLo4z1Xn2fsdbGewIJB0MK+S3fpX4IV4lUPe1Bk9+ iz1oZ8/aC8zZsWCllzE4P054w9NEZxqCAIlSGhj7BOGr2JgTCVPjOUC9g++DHcpyFOww ujlZ317jeaW1/N4JWg+5hnyishrxrpcw4lRhcxUyuOT4pDsP0qBRDOocsWn8PK4f6z9y FdzLOCD3KlIBe7lax0Shcr/vnYZmjlCBCW7L/8bkaDtPA/fq/v9EKouZWKP5ZiXSdpBB Voo/m5akUTboN29Pl/5iIQ3vWsvwlEKl3SlO/cxnlI4aot1D7V+mgyouGKnn91DZXJNy XMeA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/R8FX3NFneB2R9UMfMJSR0LJ1QCLXoSXGpf8q0Mq3g0bBVF6+ SzgjuifIzHNVLVWwkvGkqwNG9+eWxJOSbsceiRun7PuaVf4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz35TQM+cRwGwJq577FN8l1+GdEavSH5iNz8YgTuiKnLQLrAFTHb1Ze2RQhoA46Jz7n4DzWFJWrA5PaWiZ4bBI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd8d:: with SMTP id d13mr51133368wrr.208.1582320598710; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:29:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200217145711.4af495a3@canb.auug.org.au> <20200221101845.21c0c8c5@canb.auug.org.au> <20200221104328.0f897efd@canb.auug.org.au> <20200221105940.44fd67f1@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20200221105940.44fd67f1@canb.auug.org.au> From: Arjun Roy Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:29:46 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:59 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Arjun, > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:44:28 -0800 Arjun Roy wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:43 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:22:04 -0800 Arjun Roy wrote: > > > > > > > > I have a possible solution in mind, but it would involve a slight > > > > change in the SPARC macro (to be more inline with the semantics of the > > > > other platforms). > > > > If you're open to such a change, I can send it out. > > > > > > Its not up to me :-) > > > > > > If it is not too much work, I would say, do the patch, test it as you > > > can, then send it out cc'ing the Sparc maintainer (DaveM cc'd) and see > > > what happens. > > > > Certainly, I will do so. > > Just one thing: its worth while making it clear to DaveM that you just > want his Ack (rather than for him to take the patch into the Sparc > tree) so that the patch can go into Andrew's tree along with the rest > of the series. > For now since the earlier patches remain in the mm tree (as far as I can tell here https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm/tree/master) I have just sent a fixup patch for the sparc compilation issue to mm-next. I also indicated the ack request to DaveM. Thanks, -Arjun > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell