From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:02:40 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20120924192154.2aab0ae61dea89722bbcb974@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:34631 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751417Ab2IXRCm (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:02:42 -0400 Received: by lbbgj3 with SMTP id gj3so7057048lbb.19 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:02:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120924192154.2aab0ae61dea89722bbcb974@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Stephen Rothwell Hi, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h between commit 35f2b0bd5911 > ("ARM: shmobile: Move definition of shmobile_init_late() to header") from > the pm tree and commit a62580e58065 ("ARM: SoC: convert shmobile SMP to > SMP operations") from the arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Hmm. Rafael, the shmobile SoC-specific code in your tree looks like it should have been merged through arm-soc? That way we could have resolved the conflicts locally without having it spill out into other trees (and thus seen by both sfr and Linus when the branches goes up to him). -Olof