linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:45:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EDA79CE3-E8F1-4E86-9A2F-857F533BC8FF@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240313104158.5649190c@canb.auug.org.au>



> On Mar 12, 2024, at 7:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:44:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> 
>> After merging the vfs-brauner tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>> 
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c: In function 'nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict':
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:8845:32: error: 'struct file_lease' has no member named 'fl_owner'
>> 8845 |                         dp = fl->fl_owner;
>>      |                                ^~
>> 
>> Caused by commits
>> 
>>  a69ce85ec9af ("filelock: split common fields into struct file_lock_core")
>>  282c30f320ba ("filelock: remove temporary compatibility macros")
>> 
>> interacting with commit
>> 
>>  b9b89fb3e0b6 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
>> 
>> from the nfsd tree.
>> 
>> I have applied the following merge resolution patch.
>> 
>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:38:26 +1100
>> Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "filelock: split common fields into struct
>> file_lock_core"
>> 
>> interacting with "NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation"
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index 3545125c8b73..71bb0ee57cf8 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -8842,7 +8842,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
>> }
>> break_lease:
>> nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
>> - dp = fl->fl_owner;
>> + dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
>> ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
>> nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
>> spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
> 
> This is now required in the merge of the nfsd tree with Linus' tree.

Sorry, I thought Linus was going to address this when he merged
nfsd-next today. What's the preferred resolution?


--
Chuck Lever



  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-12 23:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-18 23:44 linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-12 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-12 23:45   ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2024-03-13  3:10     ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-04  2:24 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-04  7:50 ` David Howells
2024-02-11 23:52 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-12  0:36 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-23  1:52 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-24  1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-24 11:13   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-24 11:35     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-25 16:21       ` Christian Brauner
2023-12-21  0:18 Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-21  1:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-21 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-31  1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-18 23:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-19  9:17 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-02 22:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-03 13:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-28  0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-02 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-02 11:26   ` Jan Kara
2023-10-02 21:24     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-03 13:27   ` Kent Overstreet
2023-10-04 15:46     ` Jan Kara
2023-10-09 14:00       ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-28  0:39 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-28 14:52 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-03  0:03 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-03 10:06 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EDA79CE3-E8F1-4E86-9A2F-857F533BC8FF@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).