From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D16C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 05:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239657AbiCBF5Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 00:57:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42612 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232934AbiCBF5X (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 00:57:23 -0500 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.44]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 923AFB108B; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:56:39 -0800 (PST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R801e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04426;MF=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0V60zcYI_1646200596; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:tonylu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0V60zcYI_1646200596) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:56:37 +0800 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:56:35 +0800 From: Tony Lu To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Miller , Networking , Dust Li , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Message-ID: Reply-To: Tony Lu References: <20220302112209.355def40@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220302112209.355def40@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 11:22:09AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: > > net/smc/af_smc.c > > between commit: > > 4d08b7b57ece ("net/smc: Fix cleanup when register ULP fails") > > from the net tree and commit: > > 462791bbfa35 ("net/smc: add sysctl interface for SMC") > > from the net-next tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > Thanks for solving these conflicts. This looks good to me. Tony Lu