From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6344C433F5 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 21:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229780AbiJCV3Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:29:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229826AbiJCV2y (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:28:54 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1AAE205FC; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea9733e751329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:9733:e751:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 38DD31EC04F0; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 23:20:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1664832002; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=fbNSi/v14+901vFsAnl8/1DlUkDa+Lq06tjJP60k1+8=; b=LXjhsFt8EX9gCxNbzylgEg7Sg+OOriaw6t4GBWXfFxpNYKhaGBJyyTWzl/DsVMM/MdAU8p sizG0L3bjzoSVYtBnYMe2d0WscCeeDdobd57fDUcKz0rXLYxSAD6gSbjhOd+JJ89y4RjuO 9c6jf+ItrZeRrLCY+HZOI0D4s+Zu3ew= Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 23:19:58 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Randy Dunlap , Thomas Gleixner , broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 30 (i386 non-SMP non-APIC w/ IRQ_DOMAIN: build errors) Message-ID: References: <20220930154710.548289-1-broonie@kernel.org> <8635c4bw6i.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8635c4bw6i.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 07:26:29PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Can x86 practically deal with MSIs without the APIC? If not, we should > instead find a way to forbid MSIs when APIC isn't selected. Or make > APIC support mandatory. Well, you need the local APIC in order to send MSIs, that's why X86_LOCAL_APIC depends on PCI_MSI. I'll have a look at that .config tomorrow. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette