From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1F8C2D0A3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544462080C for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DkGtZNWK" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728767AbgKIJnr (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 04:43:47 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:20495 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728462AbgKIJnr (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 04:43:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604915026; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Dyt2RPIryDUpKY3QdBsRG/hsGgQZ+lKraaiM8QPeOSM=; b=DkGtZNWKVcTCVOq7+841ciVp71wMlphDAcCsPQ4c/HjSAOGyEC1AnSqvKQwHU0Ztqt/t2n DgMVYqe/NvbqvoUnupW6RHguNYSRwGZ1FWWl3mQXPfyJyxVYn53s5zLQ+0BQN8K02+26TQ CzKMZMmLr50nRMOZ6LpULfW1gOZNmc0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-91-Y42i76i3NDWOFMA1uA47NQ-1; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 04:43:45 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Y42i76i3NDWOFMA1uA47NQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E00801F98; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from starship (unknown [10.35.206.112]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B217C5D98A; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the kvm-fixes tree From: Maxim Levitsky To: Stephen Rothwell , Paolo Bonzini , KVM Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 11:43:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20201109081444.6f15fca2@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20201109081444.6f15fca2@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3 (3.36.3-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 08:14 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > In commit > > cc4cb017678a ("KVM: x86: use positive error values for msr emulation that causes #GP") > > Fixes tag > > Fixes: 291f35fb2c1d1 ("KVM: x86: report negative values from wrmsr emulation to userspace") > > has these problem(s): > > - Target SHA1 does not exist > > Maybe you meant > > Fixes: 7dffecaf4eab ("KVM: x86: report negative values from wrmsr emulation to userspace") > This is true. Looks like one of my local commits slipped though. Next time I'll check this more carefully. Can this be fixed or is it too late? Best regards, Maxim Levitsky