linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: "heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:33:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaa19a07-f4fe-e2e0-ff56-d75c334a9af1@fi.rohmeurope.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211123184142.50ff56c3@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi dee Ho peeps,

On 11/23/21 09:41, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the regulator tree, today's linux-next build (s390
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> include/Linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h:93:12: error: 'rohm_regulator_set_voltage_sel_restricted' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>    8b6e88555971 ("regulator: rohm-regulator: add helper for restricted voltage setting")


Ouch. The stub in header should be inlined. Sorry for that. I'll send 
incremental patch to Mark - please let me know if that's not sufficient?

Best Regards
	-- Matti Vaittinen

-- 
The Linux Kernel guy at ROHM Semiconductors

Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~ this year is the year of a signature writers block ~~

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-23  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23  7:41 linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-23  8:33 ` Vaittinen, Matti [this message]
2021-11-23  9:26 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-11-23 14:17   ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-07  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-22  1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-22 10:31 ` Alistair
2021-10-22 12:40   ` Mark Brown
2020-02-25 23:39 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-03  4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-03  6:46 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-08-29  3:57 Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-20  0:49 Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-20  0:56 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2017-02-01  2:42 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-01 10:03 ` Mark Brown
2017-02-02 22:30   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-03 11:31     ` Mark Brown
2015-04-09  4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-09  9:35 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-13 23:44   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-14  1:07     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-04-14  1:22       ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-14  9:40         ` Mark Brown
2015-04-15  3:03           ` Dave Airlie
2015-04-09 15:00 ` Rob Clark
2015-03-10  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-10 10:40 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-08  8:33 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-09 22:39 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-10  2:33   ` Chris Zhong
2014-09-10 10:54     ` Mark Brown
2014-09-10  2:50   ` Doug Anderson
2014-08-17 20:41 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-08  3:10 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27  4:41 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-06  6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-01  4:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-01  6:07 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-07-01  8:43   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-01  8:47     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-07-01  8:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-10  3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-21  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-21  8:13 ` Kim, Milo
2012-06-21  8:20   ` Axel Lin
2012-06-21  8:42     ` Kim, Milo
2012-06-21  9:14     ` Mark Brown
2012-06-21 11:04     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-21 11:30       ` Mark Brown
2012-06-21 17:35       ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-21  9:46   ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20  4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-20  4:55 ` Axel Lin
2012-06-20 15:33   ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-10  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-24  3:10 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-24  7:31 ` Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aaa19a07-f4fe-e2e0-ff56-d75c334a9af1@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    --to=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).