From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: linux-next: infiniband tree build failure Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:43:07 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20091120110342.5128b8f8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <6307584467EB4D168602C43E0B185157@amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:55132 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbZKTAnC (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:43:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6307584467EB4D168602C43E0B185157@amr.corp.intel.com> (Sean Hefty's message of "Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:30:55 -0800") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sean Hefty Cc: Stephen Rothwell , general@lists.openfabrics.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Off the top of my head, I'll guess that maybe we need to add something like > #if defined(CONFIG_IPv6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE) Yes, makes sense, I'll throw that in. - R.